SPAG.com review by Sarah
Date: 07.07.2022Review subject: English
Phase: Primary
Reviewer: Sarah, SENDCo
- Urban LA school 240 pupils in Buckinghamshire
- Ofsted rating: Good
- FSM: 3.3%
Review rating:
Average rating across all SPAG.com reviews: 3.7/5
How well does it match the curriculum?
Reasonably: It’s good enough for the money, but needs some additional resources
We use it to inform gaps
How well does it support adaptation for different groups of pupils?
Badly: There isn’t enough range or some the age-related expectations are misaligned
More SEN support is needed
How well does it engage and motivate pupils?
Reasonably: We can’t use it too often or for too long
Get bored
How well supported is it by any included formative assessments?
Brilliantly: We could (or do) use it for monitoring pupils or classes, for gap analysis or to inform intervention strategies
Great for identifying gaps
How well does it support planning?
Well: It’s fairly self-contained and can be used with minimal preparation
Use them as one off
How well does it support home use / independent learning?
Brilliantly: We’d have very few reservations about using this extensively to support home learning
Used during lockdown
How would you rate it for value for money compared to similar resources?
Well: It’s worth the money and effort to introduce – more so than many similar resources I’ve seen
Reasonably price
Would you recommend it to a colleague in a similar school to yours? 8/11
• Read more SPAG.com reviews
• Read more English curriculum content reviews Net promoter score for this resource:©Schoolzone 2022. Please contact us if you would like to reproduce any of this review