Classroom Secrets summary review
Date: 11.07.2022Average star rating: 4.0/5
| Overview comments: |
| • Really good and neat and tidy resources |
| • It covers so many subjects- it's great. |
| • It is used with other resources but not stand alone. |
| • Very good to show mastery in maths |
| • Search function could be easier to use |
| • Good quality resource - have and will continue to use |
| • This is a very good resource that supports planning and teaching well |
| • Some more open ended questions would be appreciated. |
| How well does it match the curriculum? |
| • 4* Not a scheme we follow but dip in and out for activities |
| • 5* It is really good, and easy to use. |
| • 4* Coverage on the website seems inline with Nat Curr expectations. |
| • 4* Particularly useful for SPaG |
| • 4* Follows the curriculum |
| • 5* Really good for mastery |
| • 5* Good range of tasks |
| • 5* The range, from lower ability to greater depth and everything in between, is the best thing about it. |
| • 5* All fits with White Rose Hub which we also use |
| • 5* It has great lesson content and worksheets that are differentiated. |
| • 4* Matches White Rose well |
| • 4* This is particularly true for Maths. |
| • 4* It runs along the national curriculum, giving you links to differentiation. |
| • 4* It is excellent for greater depth standard within the curriculum. |
| • 4* Matches White Rose |
| • 4* Can generally find resources that match my needs |
| • 4* The resources available support the classroom leaning well and therefore save teachers’ time in planning and preparing lessons |
| • 4* Follows NC and White Rose steps |
| • 4* Covers curriculum progression as necessary |
| • 4* Good at being matched to White Rose |
| • 4* It covers well and sets out as developing, expected and greater depth. |
| • 4* It provides everything that you need |
| • 4* Some mistakes! |
| • 3* good coverage of NC objectives |
| • 3* Good enough |
| • 2* It does not grasp the concept of mastery in mathematics |
| • 3* Similar depth in questions and links to SATs |
| How could it be improved to support different learners? |
| • 4* Varied activities |
| • 4* Good variety of levels of work to do. |
| • 5* Has work from year 1 to 6 |
| • 4* Activities have a range of ability |
| • 5* Pleased with the range of differentiation although could be through more varied ways rather than just bigger numbers |
| • 5* Wide range of resources for all abilities |
| • 5* Clearly differentiated tasks |
| • 4* One of the main strengths. |
| • 5* All Learning objectives are differentiated |
| • 4* Full range of resources for differentiated classrooms. |
| • 5* Very well with the various colours |
| • 4* Teachers find the resources enable them to meet the needs of the range of abilities in their classes |
| • 2* Often what is called ‘greater depth’ are just larger numbers. That’s not greater depth. |
| • * Differentiation needs further work. The level of challenges does not draw necessarily on mathematical concepts, but rather just increasing size of numbers at times |
| • 4* try, apply and deep questions |
| • 4* Three levels is great. |
| • 5* It provides lots of different representations to problems |
| • 4* Sometimes just use bigger numbers |
| • 4* breaks each objective 3 ways |
| • 4* Good differentiation |
| • 3* Enough content for pupils |
| • 2* Differentiation beyond size of numbers is limited |
| • 4* Always at least 3 levels of differentiation |
| How well does it engage and motivate pupils? |
| • 4* Lots of different topics |
| • 3* Sometimes appears rather wordy and repetitive |
| • 3* To be honest I only use it for extension purposes. |
| • 4* Children are interested but needs to include an explanation of terms first |
| • 4* Pupils engage with the questions |
| • 4* Enjoy working through the stages and challenging themselves |
| • 3* It can get a bit repetitive if overused. |
| • 4* Children like the range of questions well presented |
| • 5* Children like the challenge of the sheets especially the problem solving |
| • 5* Children are engaged and motivated with the material |
| • 4* Teaching pupils with ASD the slightly formulaic structure supports them well. |
| • 4* The fact that it is so well differentiated |
| • 5* High quality resources |
| • 5* Children choose and challenge themselves |
| • 4* Pupils are typically well engaged |
| • 4* The resources are engaging |
| • 3* Quite well. The repetition can be comforting |
| • 4* Had no issues in engagement of using resources |
| • 4* Children like the format of the questions |
| • 4* Children engage but activities can be quite short. |
| • 4* Children appreciate the format being similar most of the time |
| • 4* children appear to enjoy |
| • 4* Bit boring and nothing too exciting but good coverage |
| • 4* It is often easy for them but does not build understanding or application |
| • 2* Similar type of responses required. Creativity and variety left to teacher |
| How well supported is it by any included formative assessments? |
| • 3* It's not linked well to ARE, but it is ok for teacher assessment. |
| • 3* Assessment opportunities are available through compression tasks but limited in writing and spag. |
| • 3* Would be better if it had end of topic tests |
| • 4* The tasks are used part of formative assessment |
| • 5* Used to inform formative assessment |
| • 4* Good resource to make quick in-lesson assessments |
| • 4* Marksheets are accompanied but there are regular mistakes in them |
| • 3* Need to follow WRM |
| • 4* Clear and well matched content |
| • 4* Assessment tasks available. |
| How well does it support planning? |
| • 3* Unknown as we don’t use it for this |
| • 5* All there for you. |
| • 4* Lots of relevant material to save time. |
| • 4* Can be used as a framework and linked to resources. |
| • 3* Especially in the early days when I was unsure of some of the terminology |
| • 3* We have to do our own so difficult to comment |
| • 4* Pretty self-explanatory and well sequenced. |
| • 4* It works well alongside other resources |
| • 5* It matches the White Rose scheme |
| • 5* Gives guides and PowerPoints |
| • 4* Well matched to the curriculum |
| • 5* Matches White Rose |
| • 5* Saves me time |
| • 4* This saves teachers a lot of preparing time |
| • 4* Useful for planning topics |
| • 4* Good PowerPoints linked to the tasks |
| • 3* It matches what we need most of the time. |
| • 4* We just use it and annotate it |
| • 4* easy to follow and saves time finding resources |
| • 4* Used as an add on rather than main planning |
| • 5* Everything you need |
| • 2* Teachers can think it is good and be taken away from what is actually useful |
| • 3* Provides a basis for planning but need to edit to for needs of class and school |
| What improvements could make this better value for money? |
| • 4* It's not as expensive as some |
| • 5* good monthly price for access to all materials. |
| • 4* Can be used across topics e.g. maths so presents opportunity for a range of resources |
| • 3* It is quite cheap for a vast amount of resources |
| • 4* Good value for money |
| • 3* Expensive if funding yourself as a teacher |
| • 4* Reasonably pricey but there is a lot of content |
| • 5* Quite cheap for the amount of stuff you get. |
| • 5* Really well priced |
| • 4* Paid for personally, so highly valued |
| • 4* Provides a fair value for money |
| • 4* Really worth the money. |
| • 4* I have a personal subscription |
| • 4* Reasonable price and competitive |
| • 2* Ofsted and County would consider a lesson unsatisfactory if they saw Classroom Secrets being used |
| • 3* Good as one of several resources to dip into. |
Net promoter score for this resource:
©Schoolzone 2022. Please contact us if you would like to reproduce any of this review