Schoolzone | Classroom Secrets summary review

Classroom Secrets summary review

Date: 11.07.2022

Average star rating: 4.0/5

 

Overview comments:
 • Really good and neat and tidy resources
 • It covers so many subjects- it's great. 
 • It is used with other resources but not stand alone. 
 • Very good to show mastery in maths
 • Search function could be easier to use
 • Good quality resource - have and will continue to use 
 • This is a very good resource that supports planning and teaching well 
 • Some more open ended questions would be appreciated. 

 

How well does it match the curriculum?
 •  4* Not a scheme we follow but dip in and out for activities
 •  5* It is really good, and easy to use. 
 •  4* Coverage on the website seems inline with Nat Curr expectations. 
 •  4* Particularly useful for SPaG 
 •  4* Follows the curriculum 
 •  5* Really good for mastery 
 •  5* Good range of tasks
 •  5* The range, from lower ability to greater depth and everything in between, is the best thing about it.
 •  5* All fits with White Rose Hub which we also use
 •  5* It has great lesson content and worksheets that are differentiated.
 •  4* Matches White Rose well
 •  4* This is particularly true for Maths. 
 •  4* It runs along the national curriculum, giving you links to differentiation.
 •  4* It is excellent for greater depth standard within the curriculum.
 •  4* Matches White Rose 
 •  4* Can generally find resources that match my needs
 •  4* The resources available support the classroom leaning well and therefore save teachers’ time in planning and preparing lessons 
 •  4* Follows NC and White Rose steps 
 •  4* Covers curriculum progression as necessary 
 •  4* Good at being matched to White Rose
 •  4* It covers well and sets out as developing, expected and greater depth.
 •  4* It provides everything that you need 
 •  4* Some mistakes!
 •  3* good coverage of NC objectives
 •  3* Good enough 
 •  2* It does not grasp the concept of mastery in mathematics
 •  3* Similar depth in questions and links to SATs

 

How could it be improved to support different learners?
 •  4* Varied activities
 •  4* Good variety of levels of work to do. 
 •  5* Has work from year 1 to 6
 •  4* Activities have a range of ability 
 •  5* Pleased with the range of differentiation although could be through more varied ways rather than just bigger numbers
 •  5* Wide range of resources for all abilities
 •  5* Clearly differentiated tasks
 •  4* One of the main strengths. 
 •  5* All Learning objectives are differentiated
 •  4* Full range of resources for differentiated classrooms. 
 •  5* Very well with the various colours
 •  4* Teachers find the resources enable them to meet the needs of the range of abilities in their classes 
 •  2* Often what is called ‘greater depth’ are just larger numbers. That’s not greater depth.
 •  * Differentiation needs further work. The level of challenges does not draw necessarily on mathematical concepts, but rather just increasing size of numbers at times
 •  4* try, apply and deep questions
 •  4* Three levels is great.
 •  5* It provides lots of different representations to problems 
 •  4* Sometimes just use bigger numbers
 •  4* breaks each objective 3 ways
 •  4* Good differentiation 
 •  3* Enough content for pupils
 •  2* Differentiation beyond size of numbers is limited
 •  4* Always at least 3 levels of differentiation 

 

How well does it engage and motivate pupils?
 •  4* Lots of different topics
 •  3* Sometimes appears rather wordy and repetitive
 •  3* To be honest I only use it for extension purposes. 
 •  4* Children are interested but needs to include an explanation of terms first 
 •  4* Pupils engage with the questions 
 •  4* Enjoy working through the stages and challenging themselves
 •  3* It can get a bit repetitive if overused.
 •  4* Children like the range of questions well presented
 •  5* Children like the challenge of the sheets especially the problem solving
 •  5* Children are engaged and motivated with the material 
 •  4* Teaching pupils with ASD the slightly formulaic structure supports them well. 
 •  4* The fact that it is so well differentiated
 •  5* High quality resources
 •  5* Children choose and challenge themselves 
 •  4* Pupils are typically well engaged
 •  4* The resources are engaging 
 •  3* Quite well. The repetition can be comforting 
 •  4* Had no issues in engagement of using resources
 •  4* Children like the format of the questions
 •  4* Children engage but activities  can be quite short. 
 •  4* Children appreciate the format being similar most of the time
 •  4* children appear to enjoy
 •  4* Bit boring and nothing too exciting but good coverage 
 •  4* It is often easy for them but does not build understanding or application
 •  2* Similar type of responses required. Creativity and variety left to teacher 

 

How well supported is it by any included formative assessments?
 •  3* It's not linked well to ARE, but it is ok for teacher assessment. 
 •  3* Assessment opportunities are available through compression tasks but limited in writing and spag. 
 •  3* Would be better if it had end of topic tests 
 •  4* The tasks are used part of formative assessment 
 •  5* Used to inform formative assessment 
 •  4* Good resource to make quick in-lesson assessments
 •  4* Marksheets are accompanied but there are regular mistakes in them 
 •  3* Need to follow WRM
 •  4* Clear and well matched content
 •  4* Assessment tasks available. 

 

How well does it support planning?
 •  3* Unknown as we don’t use it for this
 •  5* All there for you.
 •  4* Lots of relevant  material to save time. 
 •  4* Can be used as a framework and linked to resources. 
 •  3* Especially in the early days when I was unsure of some of the terminology 
 •  3* We have to do our own so difficult to comment 
 •  4* Pretty self-explanatory and well sequenced.
 •  4* It works well alongside other resources
 •  5* It matches the White Rose scheme 
 •  5* Gives guides and PowerPoints
 •  4* Well matched to the curriculum
 •  5* Matches White Rose 
 •  5* Saves me time
 •  4* This saves teachers a lot of preparing time 
 •  4* Useful for planning topics
 •  4* Good PowerPoints linked to the tasks
 •  3* It matches what we need most of the time. 
 •  4* We just use it and annotate it
 •  4* easy to follow and saves time finding resources
 •  4* Used as an add on rather than main planning 
 •  5* Everything you need
 •  2* Teachers can think it is good and be taken away from what is actually useful
 •  3* Provides a basis for planning but need to edit to for needs of class and school

 

What improvements could make this better value for money?
 • 4* It's not as expensive as some 
 • 5* good monthly price for access to all materials. 
 • 4* Can be used across topics e.g. maths so presents opportunity for a range of resources 
 • 3* It is quite cheap for a vast amount of resources 
 • 4* Good value for money 
 • 3* Expensive if funding yourself as a teacher
 • 4* Reasonably pricey but there is a lot of content
 • 5* Quite cheap for the amount of stuff you get.
 • 5* Really well priced
 • 4* Paid for personally, so highly valued
 • 4* Provides a fair value for money
 • 4* Really worth the money.
 • 4* I have a personal subscription
 • 4* Reasonable price and competitive 
 • 2* Ofsted and County would consider a lesson unsatisfactory if they saw Classroom Secrets being used
 • 3* Good as one of several resources to dip into.

 

Net promoter score for this resource:

 

 

 

Search all reviews

©Schoolzone 2022. Please contact us if you would like to reproduce any of this review