Classroom Secrets summary review
Date: 11.07.2022Average star rating: 4.0/5
Overview comments: |
• Really good and neat and tidy resources |
• It covers so many subjects- it's great. |
• It is used with other resources but not stand alone. |
• Very good to show mastery in maths |
• Search function could be easier to use |
• Good quality resource - have and will continue to use |
• This is a very good resource that supports planning and teaching well |
• Some more open ended questions would be appreciated. |
How well does it match the curriculum? |
• 4* Not a scheme we follow but dip in and out for activities |
• 5* It is really good, and easy to use. |
• 4* Coverage on the website seems inline with Nat Curr expectations. |
• 4* Particularly useful for SPaG |
• 4* Follows the curriculum |
• 5* Really good for mastery |
• 5* Good range of tasks |
• 5* The range, from lower ability to greater depth and everything in between, is the best thing about it. |
• 5* All fits with White Rose Hub which we also use |
• 5* It has great lesson content and worksheets that are differentiated. |
• 4* Matches White Rose well |
• 4* This is particularly true for Maths. |
• 4* It runs along the national curriculum, giving you links to differentiation. |
• 4* It is excellent for greater depth standard within the curriculum. |
• 4* Matches White Rose |
• 4* Can generally find resources that match my needs |
• 4* The resources available support the classroom leaning well and therefore save teachers’ time in planning and preparing lessons |
• 4* Follows NC and White Rose steps |
• 4* Covers curriculum progression as necessary |
• 4* Good at being matched to White Rose |
• 4* It covers well and sets out as developing, expected and greater depth. |
• 4* It provides everything that you need |
• 4* Some mistakes! |
• 3* good coverage of NC objectives |
• 3* Good enough |
• 2* It does not grasp the concept of mastery in mathematics |
• 3* Similar depth in questions and links to SATs |
How could it be improved to support different learners? |
• 4* Varied activities |
• 4* Good variety of levels of work to do. |
• 5* Has work from year 1 to 6 |
• 4* Activities have a range of ability |
• 5* Pleased with the range of differentiation although could be through more varied ways rather than just bigger numbers |
• 5* Wide range of resources for all abilities |
• 5* Clearly differentiated tasks |
• 4* One of the main strengths. |
• 5* All Learning objectives are differentiated |
• 4* Full range of resources for differentiated classrooms. |
• 5* Very well with the various colours |
• 4* Teachers find the resources enable them to meet the needs of the range of abilities in their classes |
• 2* Often what is called ‘greater depth’ are just larger numbers. That’s not greater depth. |
• * Differentiation needs further work. The level of challenges does not draw necessarily on mathematical concepts, but rather just increasing size of numbers at times |
• 4* try, apply and deep questions |
• 4* Three levels is great. |
• 5* It provides lots of different representations to problems |
• 4* Sometimes just use bigger numbers |
• 4* breaks each objective 3 ways |
• 4* Good differentiation |
• 3* Enough content for pupils |
• 2* Differentiation beyond size of numbers is limited |
• 4* Always at least 3 levels of differentiation |
How well does it engage and motivate pupils? |
• 4* Lots of different topics |
• 3* Sometimes appears rather wordy and repetitive |
• 3* To be honest I only use it for extension purposes. |
• 4* Children are interested but needs to include an explanation of terms first |
• 4* Pupils engage with the questions |
• 4* Enjoy working through the stages and challenging themselves |
• 3* It can get a bit repetitive if overused. |
• 4* Children like the range of questions well presented |
• 5* Children like the challenge of the sheets especially the problem solving |
• 5* Children are engaged and motivated with the material |
• 4* Teaching pupils with ASD the slightly formulaic structure supports them well. |
• 4* The fact that it is so well differentiated |
• 5* High quality resources |
• 5* Children choose and challenge themselves |
• 4* Pupils are typically well engaged |
• 4* The resources are engaging |
• 3* Quite well. The repetition can be comforting |
• 4* Had no issues in engagement of using resources |
• 4* Children like the format of the questions |
• 4* Children engage but activities can be quite short. |
• 4* Children appreciate the format being similar most of the time |
• 4* children appear to enjoy |
• 4* Bit boring and nothing too exciting but good coverage |
• 4* It is often easy for them but does not build understanding or application |
• 2* Similar type of responses required. Creativity and variety left to teacher |
How well supported is it by any included formative assessments? |
• 3* It's not linked well to ARE, but it is ok for teacher assessment. |
• 3* Assessment opportunities are available through compression tasks but limited in writing and spag. |
• 3* Would be better if it had end of topic tests |
• 4* The tasks are used part of formative assessment |
• 5* Used to inform formative assessment |
• 4* Good resource to make quick in-lesson assessments |
• 4* Marksheets are accompanied but there are regular mistakes in them |
• 3* Need to follow WRM |
• 4* Clear and well matched content |
• 4* Assessment tasks available. |
How well does it support planning? |
• 3* Unknown as we don’t use it for this |
• 5* All there for you. |
• 4* Lots of relevant material to save time. |
• 4* Can be used as a framework and linked to resources. |
• 3* Especially in the early days when I was unsure of some of the terminology |
• 3* We have to do our own so difficult to comment |
• 4* Pretty self-explanatory and well sequenced. |
• 4* It works well alongside other resources |
• 5* It matches the White Rose scheme |
• 5* Gives guides and PowerPoints |
• 4* Well matched to the curriculum |
• 5* Matches White Rose |
• 5* Saves me time |
• 4* This saves teachers a lot of preparing time |
• 4* Useful for planning topics |
• 4* Good PowerPoints linked to the tasks |
• 3* It matches what we need most of the time. |
• 4* We just use it and annotate it |
• 4* easy to follow and saves time finding resources |
• 4* Used as an add on rather than main planning |
• 5* Everything you need |
• 2* Teachers can think it is good and be taken away from what is actually useful |
• 3* Provides a basis for planning but need to edit to for needs of class and school |
What improvements could make this better value for money? |
• 4* It's not as expensive as some |
• 5* good monthly price for access to all materials. |
• 4* Can be used across topics e.g. maths so presents opportunity for a range of resources |
• 3* It is quite cheap for a vast amount of resources |
• 4* Good value for money |
• 3* Expensive if funding yourself as a teacher |
• 4* Reasonably pricey but there is a lot of content |
• 5* Quite cheap for the amount of stuff you get. |
• 5* Really well priced |
• 4* Paid for personally, so highly valued |
• 4* Provides a fair value for money |
• 4* Really worth the money. |
• 4* I have a personal subscription |
• 4* Reasonable price and competitive |
• 2* Ofsted and County would consider a lesson unsatisfactory if they saw Classroom Secrets being used |
• 3* Good as one of several resources to dip into. |
Net promoter score for this resource:
©Schoolzone 2022. Please contact us if you would like to reproduce any of this review